44 Votes

Local Gravity for different Places and Planets

Info by Collin McNeil | Last update on 2024-06-10 | Created on 2018-03-03

In this article I would like to contrast the local gravity also known as the gravitational acceleration, the local mass difference, the location factor, respectively the acceleration due to gravity for different locations.

In the next sections you will find a table for each the

After that, we will have a look at the practical effects of these different gravitational accelerations on the time and speed of the fall and finally we briefly discuss the calculation of the local gravity as well as the calculation of the time and speed of the fall. Unless otherwise stated, the values ​​in the tables are specified in m/s².

Local Gravity of different Places on Earth

The mean surface gravity on the Earth is 9.81 m/s², 9.807 m/s² or 9.8067 m/s², depending on whether you want to calculate with two, three or four decimal places. The local gravity for a constant height is smallest at the equator, while the gravitational acceleration increases towards the North Pole and the South Pole, and is greatest at the poles. This results in a difference of 0.045 m/s² between the poles and the equator. If you want to know why this is the case, you can find an answer here.

PlaceLocal Gravity
Earth Surface Mean Value9.807 (9.81)
Earth Surface at the Equator9.787
Earth Surface at the Poles9.832
10 km above the Surface9.72
100 km above the Surface9.52
1,000 km above the Surface7.33
2,000 km above the Surface5.68
5,000 km above the Surface3.08
10,000 km above the Surface1.49
50,000 km above the Surface0.13

The higher we rise from the earth's surface, the smaller the gravitational force respectively the earth's gravity becomes. While at 10 km above the surface of the earth we still can find a gravitational acceleration of 9.72 m/s², which is almost comparable to the equator on the surface, at 1,000 km above the earth's surface the gravity is only 7.33 m/s² and at 5,000 km above the earth's surface it is only 3.08 m/s². As the distance from the earth increases, the gravitational acceleration continues to decrease and is, as an example, with just 0.13 m/s² barely measurable at an altitude of 50,000 km.

Local Gravity of the Planets in our Solar System

There are even greater differences when we look at our neighboring planets (and in the case of Eris, Ceres, Haumea, Makemake and Pluto, dwarf planets) within our solar system. The following table shows the surface gravity of all eight planets in our solar system, including the five known and officially recognized dwarf planets as well as our sun, in descending order. For comparison, I have also added our moon to the list of these celestial bodies.

Additionally, the table also contains information about the mass (in kilograms) and the radius (in kilometers) of the respective celestial body, as this information is required to calculate the local gravity for your own. Specifications such as 5.9722E24 are to be understood as 5.9722*10²⁴. For celestial bodies that are not perfectly rounded, such as Ceres, Haumea and Makemake, the radius is specified as an average value.

Place Local Gravity Mass Radius
Sun274.11.9884E30696.342
Jupiter25.931.8981E2769.911
Neptune11.281.0241E2624.622
Saturn11.195.6834E2658.232
Earth9.8075.9722E246.371
Uranus9.0108.6810E2525.362
Venus8.8724.8673E246.052
Mars3.7286.4171E233.389
Mercury3.7033.3011E232.439
Moon (Earth)1.6257.3477E221.737
Eris0.8271.6466E221.163
Pluto0.6201.3025E221.188
Makemake0.4503.1000E21715
Haumea0.4014.0060E21780
Ceres0.2849.3839E20469

As we can see, the difference between the dwarf planet Ceres, with an average surface gravity of just 0.284 m/s², and our sun with 274.1 m/s² is enormous. On Ceres, we would feel 34 times lighter than on Earth, while on the sun we would feel 28 times heavier than on Earth (assuming we could even make it to the scales at the temperature there).

A person with an earth weight of 75 kg would therefore, mathematically speaking, only have to carry 2.17 kg on Ceres, but impressive 2.1 tonnes on the Sun (the masses would of course remain constant regardless of the environment). On Pluto it would be 4.7 kg and on Jupiter 198 kg.

On our moon, the difference to our home planet would not be quite that great. Here the gravitational force is only six times less than on Earth. This means that our 75 kg test person would only have to carry a sixth of their body weight, that is around 12.5 kg. The difference between Earth and Venus, Uranus, Saturn and Neptune would be even smaller. Here the local surface gravities are between 8.87 m/s² and 11.28 m/s² and are thus almost at the same level as on our home planet. In the next section, we would like to look at what it looks like on the moons of the other planets in our solar system.

Local Gravity of the Moons in our Solar System

In the following, we would like to look at the local gravity of the most important moons of all the planets in our solar system, including the moons of the dwarf planets Pluto and Eris. All moons with a diameter of more than 500 kilometers are listed, as well as other important smaller moons of celestial bodies without larger moons, each with its associated planet in the second column and its number in the third column.

The fifth and sixth columns contain the mass (in kilograms) as well as the radius (in kilometers) of the respective moon. For non-circular moons, an average radius is given, and for very distant moons such as Charon and Dysnomia in particular, the values ​​are only approximations with a large uncertainty factor. So, for example, Dysnomia is assumed to have a size of about 615 +/- 55 km and a mass of (8.2 +/- 5.7)*10¹⁹ kg, which makes calculating the local gravity difficult there. The list is sorted from the sun to the edge of our solar system, from the inside out.

Moon Planet No Local Gravity Mass Radius
MoonEarthI1.6257.3477E221,737
PhobosMarsI0.00571.0600E1611
DeimosMarsII0.0031.5100E156
IoJupiterI1.7898.9319E221,821
EuropaJupiterII1.3144.7998E221,560
GanymedeJupiterIII1.4261.4819E232,634
CallistoJupiterIV1.2351.0759E232,410
MimasSaturnI0.0643.7509E19198
EnceladusSaturnII0.1131.0803E20252
TethysSaturnIII0.1466.1749E20533
DioneSaturnIV0.2321.0954E21561
RheaSaturnV0.2642.3064E21763
TitanSaturnVI1.3461.3452E232,574
HyperionSaturnVII0.0175.5510E18135
IapetusSaturnVIII0.2231.8056E21735
ArielUranusI0.2461.2331E21579
UmbrielUranusII0.2521.2885E21584
TitaniaUranusIII0.3793.4550E21788
OberonUranusIV0.3473.1104E21761
MirandaUranusV0.0766.2930E19236
TritonNeptuneI0.7792.1389E221,353
NereidNeptuneII0.0713.5700E19170
CharonPlutoI0.2881.5897E21606
DysnomiaErisI0.0588.2000E19307

As you can see, the surface gravities of the moons are on average significantly smaller than those of the planets. This is naturally due to the smaller size and consequently the lower mass of the moons compared to the size and mass of the planets they orbit. Jupiter's moon Io has the largest gravitational acceleration of all the moons of the planets in our solar system with a surface gravity of 1.789 m/s², while our own moon closely follows on the second place of this ranking with 1.625 m/s².

However, the moon in our solar system with the lowest gravitational acceleration is difficult to determine, as there are just too many small and tiny moons, which, on the one hand, have not yet been fully explored, while, on the other hand, new ones are constantly being discovered. So far, over 145 moons of Saturn, as well as 95 moons of Jupiter, 28 moons of Uranus and 16 moons of Neptune have been discovered. Many of them are so small that they remained undiscovered for a long time or have only been given a number instead of a proper name. For example, Saturn's moon Aegaeon, which was only discovered in 2009, has a diameter of just 540 to 780 meters and, with a mass of only around 80 million tons, does not even have a gravitational acceleration of 0.00005 m/s². In addition, the exact masses and diameters in particular of the small moons have not been precisely researched, and therefore the calculation of their local gravities can only represent an approximation of the true value, making an accurate list impossible. Also for this reason, I have not included all known moons into the list and have limited it to the most important ones.

By the way, the planets Mercury and Venus as well as the dwarf planet Ceres are not part of this list because these celestial bodies do not have their own natural satellites.

Gravitational Acceleration in Fall Time and Speed

But what do the values ​​presented here mean in practice? How do the different local gravities manifest themselves on the various planets and moons? It is not for nothing that we also refer to the local gravity as the acceleration due to gravity, gravitational acceleration or gravity acceleration, because the higher the local gravity, the faster we accelerate in free fall.

To illustrate this with a practical example, I have therefore compared some of the planets and moons in the next table in this regard and calculated how long a fall from a height of 100 meters would take under the different conditions (the different gravitational accelerations) and what the maximum speed would be at the end of the free fall after 100 meters:

Celestial Body Local Gravity Time Speed
Sun274.10.85 s843 km/h
Merkur3.7037.4 s98 km/h
Venus8.8724.8 s152 km/h
Erde9.8074.5 s159 km/h
Mond (Erde)1.62511.1 s65 km/h
Mars3.7287.3 s98 km/h
Phobos (Mars)0.0057187.3 s3.8 km/h
Deimos (Mars)0.003258.2 s2.8 km/h
Ceres0.28426.5 s27 km/h
Jupiter25.932.8 s259 km/h
Io (Jupiter)1.78910.6 s68 km/h
Europa (Jupiter)1.31412.3 s58 km/h
Ganymede (Jupiter)1.42611.8 s61 km/h
Callisto (Jupiter)1.23512.7 s57 km/h
Saturn11.194.2 s170 km/h
Mimas (Saturn)0.06455.9 s13 km/h
Enceladus (Saturn)0.11342.1 s17 km/h
Tethys (Saturn)0.14637.0 s19 km/h
Dione (Saturn)0.23229.4 s25 km/h
Rhea (Saturn)0.26427.5 s26 km/h
Titan (Saturn)1.34612.2 s59 km/h
Hyperion (Saturn)0.017108.5 s6.6 km/h
Iapetus (Saturn)0.22329.9 s24 km/h
Aegaeon (Saturn)0.000052000 s0.36 km/h
Uranus9.0104.7 s153 km/h
Ariel (Uranus)0.24628.5 s25 km/h
Umbriel (Uranus)0.25228.2 s26 km/h
Titania (Uranus)0.37923.0 s31 km/h
Oberon (Uranus)0.34724.0 s30 km/h
Miranda (Uranus)0.07651.3 s14 km/h
Neptun11.284.2 s171 km/h
Triton (Neptune)0.77916.0 s45 km/h
Nereid (Neptune)0.07153.1 s14 km/h
Pluto0.62017.9 s40 km/h
Charon (Pluto)0.28826.4 s27 km/h
Eris0.82715.6 s46 km/h
Dysnomia (Eris)0.05858.7 s12 km/h
Haumea0.40122.3 s32 km/h
Makemake0.45021.1 s34 km/h

As we can see, we experience the most extreme gravitational acceleration (how could it be otherwise) on our sun, which, as we know, has by far the largest mass and the largest surface gravity of all the celestial bodies compared here. A fall from a height of 100 meters on the sun would take less than a second (0.85 seconds) and in this short time, when you reach the ground, you would have already reached a speed of 843 kilometers per hour shortly before your impact.

Compared to that, we would fall the slowest on many of the smaller moons and of course on our small dwarf planets. Of the dwarf planets in our solar system, Ceres has the lowest acceleration due to gravity, with a surface gravity of only 0.284 m/s², which would mean that we would need 16.7 seconds for a free fall from a height of 100 meters and would only reach a final speed of 27 kilometers per hour. In comparison, on Earth we would have reached the ground after just 4.5 seconds and would have reached a speed of 159 km/h at that time. On our moon, with 11.1 seconds falling time and a maximum final speed of 65 km/h, we would fall about twice as long.

Even longer, the fall would take on many of the countless tiny moons in our solar system. Due to the large number of these moons, however, our comparison only shows the most important and largest moons of the individual planets and, only as an extreme example, Saturn's moon Aegaeon, which is just a few hundred meters in size. On this moon, the "free fall" from a height of 100 meters would with 2,000 seconds take over half an hour and with 0.36 km/h (0.1 m/s), not even a single kilometer per hour would be achievable as a final speed. However, it must be said that this calculation is based only on estimates, since the exact mass and dimensions of Aegaeon have so far only been determined with a certain degree of uncertainty. So, for Aegaeon, a mass of about (7.82 +/- 3)*10¹⁰ kg is assumed, which makes it difficult to calculate its gravitational acceleration precisely. Also this speaks in favor of restricting the calculations to the large planets and moons for which more precise physical characteristics are available.

Calculation of the Local Gravity

Finally, I would like to briefly explain how you can calculate the values ​​shown in the tables for your own.

To calculate the local gravity g for a location of an arbitrary distance from the center of a celestial body, for example for a location on the surface of a celestial body or for a location at a certain height above the surface of a celestial body, in addition to the gravitational constant G, we only need the mass and the radius respectively the distance of the location from the center of the celestial body to be calculated. For this reason, in the tables of planets and moons, I have also listed their mass and their radius in addition to the surface gravity already calculated, so that you can use this information for your own calculations.

I present the exact formula for calculating a local gravity, which includes these three values, in the info about calculating the local gravity, in which I show not only the formula but also some examples for calculating various location factors.

Calculation of the Fall Time and Fall Speed

Also the time of fall as well as the speed of fall, which we saw in the section on the Gravitational Acceleration in Fall Time and Speed, can easily be calculated. For a given way, we only need the local gravity respectively the gravitational acceleration in order to be able to calculate the time and the speed required for this way. I have put together the necessary formulas spiced with some examples of their application in my info about calculating the free fall for you.

ReplyPositiveNegative

About the Author

AvatarThe author has not added a profile short description yet.
Show Profile

 

Related Topics

Important Note

Please note: The contributions published on askingbox.com are contributions of users and should not substitute professional advice. They are not verified by independents and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of askingbox.com. Learn more.

Participate

Ask your own question or write your own article on askingbox.com. That’s how it’s done.