Spam Protection: Is it useful to write on websites [at] instead of @?
Question by Compi | 2012-04-23 at 17:38
Today, often you can see on web sites instead of email@example.com one of the following notations:
mail[at]example.com mail[at]example[dot].com mail(at)example(dot).com
Sense of the whole thing is, of course, to protect yourself from crawlers, searching the Internet for e-mail addresses to send spam mails. These crawlers look after the @-sign in their attempt to come to email addresses.
I would like to discuss once, if that makes sense or the whole thing is only a waste of effort.
How to avoid Spam Mails
Tip | 0 Comments
Change Write Protection of multiple Files at once
Tutorial | 0 Comments
Why do websites use CAPTCHA systems?
Info | 0 Comments
What is Referrer Spam?
Question | 4 Answers
What is Stock Spam?
Question | 1 Answer
Spam-Mails: Do unsubscribe-links have any effect?
Question | 1 Answer
Reload Images, CSS, JS and Web Pages despite Browser Cache
Tip | 2 Comments
Please note: The contributions published on askingbox.com are contributions of users and should not substitute professional advice. They are not verified by independents and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of askingbox.com. Learn more.
Ask your own question or write your own article on askingbox.com. That’s how it’s done.
If I were a crawler, and I were introduced to catch as many e-mail addresses as I could, I would rather search for [at], (at), [ad] and [ad] than for the @-sign. I think, with this approach, the yield would be a lot bigger, because now everyone's email addresses are written in that style.
If you already want to abbreviate the mail address, I would prefer something extraordinary that not everyone get. For example:
The Ä is not as widespread as the other solutions, and therefore, crawlers might look at that probably less likely. Also, the spaces make it safer and more difficult because only a person can make the real connection.
But if the older people understand that? I doubt it, and ease of use is also something else.
2012-04-25 at 11:25
Basically, I would just post no email addresses on the Internet at all! Everything else sooner or later leads to spam, no matter how you try to protect yourself!
2012-04-26 at 10:58
I think, this is a double edged sword. Sure, it's a good idea to publish no e-mail addresses in the net. However, in some countries, one is obliged to do so according to the imprint obligation, because otherwise, you can be admonished.
And I would not be surprised, when a court would decide that writing an [at] is an insufficient labeling of an email address. That would mean, that you can injure your legal imprint obligations by using a [at] notation.
Unfortunately, this is like that in some countries, I also would prefer a contact form (which would also have other advantages over an e-mail address), but the jurisprudence, at this point, seem to have to go probably a long further way to reach the Internet life.
2012-04-29 at 05:09
Simply publish your e-mail address as an image file. So you're definitely on the safe side and the crawler can nothing do anymore!
2012-04-30 at 19:01
Caution! Image files with e-mail addresses in the imprint can be admonished! Finally, with this, accessibility is no longer be guaranteed.
Elsewhere on the website, that would be a possibility, but I can imagine that the crawlers do not need a long time until they will also understand pictures!
2012-05-02 at 16:17